Multimedia
Since SRI’s establishment in 2003, IDVAAC has hosted and conducted several activities including roundtables, interviews, meetings, and a conference. In addition, IDVAAC has developed in-depth reports and training videos relevant to the city of Detroit, Domestic Violence and Prisoner re-entry. Here’s a visual sampling of just a few of these products.
PRINT
SRI
Roundtable Brief
During the initial phase of the Safe Return Initiative, IDVAAC in partnership
with the Vera Institute of Justice conducted a roundtable discussion with
representatives from re-entry programs in Nashville, Tennessee; Minneapolis,
Minnesota; and Portland, Oregon. These programs are unique because of their
attention to the safety needs of women in relationships with men in prison
and on parole. This report summarizes these sites’ descriptions of their
work, what they perceive as challenges and what they believe can enhance
their efforts.
Safe Return: Phase 1 Report 2003-2005

Oliver Williams, Ph.D.
Most efforts to address re-entry have focused on the influence of unemployment,
substance abuse, and inadequate housing on prisoners’ post-release success.
To date, limited attention has been given to the connection between domestic
violence and criminal recidivism. This report highlights Safe Return Initiative
training efforts in Minnesota to address the important, yet understudied
intersection of prisoner re-entry and domestic violence.
Domestic
Violence and Prisoner Reentry: Experiences of African American Women and
Men
Creasie Finney Hairston and William Oliver
This report recommends ways to address domestic violence when African
American women are in intimate relationships with African American men
who are in prison or on parole. The report draws on discussion groups of
men and women dealing with reentry who were asked how similarly situated
people experience and manage conflict with their partners. Through these
discussions, Safe Return found that some women believe the experience of
imprisonment negatively influences some men's behavior as husbands and
fathers after release; men reported that some similarly situated men try
to control their intimate partners while inside prison or consider violence
to be an appropriate response to infidelity or perceived slights. The recommendations
include emphasizing cultural competence in programming and providing institutional
support to intimate partners and their children who are preparing for an
incarcerated person's return, whether or not they choose to reunify with
returning prisoners.
Safe
Return: Working Toward Preventing Domestic Violence When Men Return From
Prison
Mike Bobbitt, Robin Campbell, and Gloria L. Tate
Corrections and parole officials and domestic violence advocates met
in two roundtable discussions to examine ways to address intimate partner
violence when men return from prison. This report summarizes the practices
and key challenges identified in those meetings and addresses themes such
as institutional resistance to addressing domestic violence, ways to involve
intimate partners-including women who may have been victims of domestic
violence-in reentry planning, and the value of cultural competence and
programming that considers race. Participants expressed a need for training
and ongoing dialogue between criminal justice staff and domestic violence
advocates, and noted the value of including the perspectives of former
victims to improve practice.
Participant Workbook
& Facilitator Manual (FREE!)
Building Responsible Individualized Dynamics Gaining Essential Safety
(BRIDGES) is a model of intervention for programming that is time limited
within a jail or prison.
This curriculum is not intended to be a full batterer intervention
program but rather to fit into a progressive and systemic model of intervening
with this unique perpetrator of violence against women and children.Created
by Alternatives to Domestic Aggression,
Catholic
Social Services of Washtenaw County, Ann Arbor Michigan.
VIDEO
|